Smart Search 


1_2021_sen_9

Title of the article REPRESENTATION OF THE PRODUCT AS AN OBJECT OF DIGITALIZATION OF PRODUCTION WITH A STRUCTURED SET OF MODULES
Authors

BAZROV Boris M., D. Sc. in Eng., Prof., Head of the Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

VASILIEV Alexander S., D. Sc. in Eng., Prof., Head of the Department, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

HUREVICH Valeriy L., Ph. D. in Eng., Assoc. Prof., Director, Belarusian State Institute of Metrology, Minsk, Republic of Belarus, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

POPOK Nikolay N., D. Sc. in Eng., Prof., Head of the Department, Polotsk State University, Novopolotsk, Republic of Belarus, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

KHEIFETS Ilya M., Master’s Student, Graduate School of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
In the section MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES
Year 2021
Issue 1
Pages 62–70
Type of article RAR
Index UDK 621.9.06+536.75
DOI https://doi.org/10.46864/1995-0470-2020-1-54-62-70
Abstract Disadvantages of the traditional description of a mechanical engineering product are shown, which are based on technological features oriented to single, typical and group operations of the technological process. It is proposed to represent the design of the product and its parts with a structured set of relevant technological modules, in the form of a graph of a hierarchical structure. The availability of a unified methodological base makes it possible to control the development of constructively complex products, minimize duplication in the creation of new designs and effectively develope resource-saving technologies for their manufacture. The choice of the method for assessing the manufacturability of the product design is substantiated by the labor intensity of the processes at the stages of its life cycle and the formation of a set of criteria that generalize the assessment of design and technological solutions by coefficients that take into account their degree of influence on the technical and economic indicators of the processes. On the basis of a technical and economic analysis, a method for the integral assessment of production manufacturability in the product life cycle has been formed. The method combines various coefficients of manufacturability, taking into account the degree of their influence on the labor intensity of production and maintenance, repair and disposal of the product structure. Based on the results of the feasibility study, it was proposed to understand the manufacturability of the product design at the stages of its production and disposal as production adaptability.
Keywords product, part, construction, object, item, operation, structure, module, graph, level
  You can access full text version of the article.
Bibliography
  1. Hannam R. Computer integrated manufacturing: from concepts to realization. Harlow, Addison Wesley, 1977. 258 p.
  2. Bratukhin A.G., et al. CALS v aviastroenii [CALS in aircraft construction]. Moscow, Moskovskiy aviatsionnyy institut Publ., 2000. 304 p. (in Russ.).
  3. Cherpakov B.I., et al. Kompyuterizirovannye integrirovannye proizvodstva i CALS-tekhnologii v mashinostroenii [Computerized integrated production and CALS-technologies in mechanical engineering]. Moscow, GUP “VIMI” Publ., 1999. 512 p. (in Russ.).
  4. Vityaz P.A., Kheifetz M.L., Chizhik S.A. “Industriya 4.0”: ot informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh i additivnykh tekhnologiy k samovosproizvedeniyu mashin i organizmov [“Industry 4.0”: from information and communication and additive technologies to self-reproduction of machines and organisms]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Physical-technical series, 2017, no. 2, pp. 54–72 (in Russ.).
  5. Intellektualnoe proizvodstvo: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Intellectual production: state and prospects]. Novopolotsk, Polotskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2002. 268 p. (in Russ.).
  6. Rusetsky A.M., et al. Teoreticheskie osnovy proektirovaniya tekhnologicheskikh kompleksov [Theoretical bases of technological systems designing]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2012. 239 p. (in Russ.).
  7. Gibson I., Rosen D., Stuker B. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. New York, Springer, 2015. 498 p.
  8. Additive manufacturing for the aerospace industry. Cambridge, Elsevier, 2019. 465 p.
  9. Chizhik S.A., Vityaz P.A., Kheifetz M.L., et al. Obespechenie kachestva izdeliy v tekhnologicheskikh kompleksakh [Quality assurance of products in technological complexes]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2019. 248 p. (in Russ.).
  10. Vasiliev A.S., Dalskiy A.M., Klimenko S.A., et al. Tekhnologicheskie osnovy upravleniya kachestvom mashin [Technological bases of machine quality management]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 2003. 256 p. (in Russ.).
  11. Dalskiy A.M., Bazrov B.M., Vasiliev A.S., et al. Tekhnologicheskaya nasledstvennost v mashinostroitelnom proizvodstve [Technological strain in mechanical engineering]. Moscow, Moskovskiy aviatsionnyy institut Publ., 2000. 364 p. (in Russ.).
  12. Kheifetz M.L., Tochilo V.S., Semenov V.I., et al. Statisticheskiy analiz konstruktivnykh elementov i tekhnologicheskikh parametrov detaley mashin [Statistical analysis of structural elements and technological parameters of machine parts]. Novopolotsk, Polotskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2001. 112 p. (in Russ.).
  13. Bazrov B.M. Modulnaya tekhnologiya v mashinostroenii [Module technology in mechanical engineering]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 2001. 368 p. (in Russ.).
  14. Rusetsky A.M., et al. Konstruirovanie i osnashchenie tekhnologicheskikh kompleksov [Designing and equipping of technological systems]. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2014. 316 p. (in Russ.).
  15. Goverdovskaya R.G. Metodika otrabotki konstruktsiy na tekhnologichnost i otsenki urovnya tekhnologichnosti izdeliy mashinostroeniya i priborostroeniya [Method of testing structures for manufacturability and evaluating the level of manufacturability of mechanical engineering and instrument-making products]. Moscow, Standartov Publ., 1976. 56 p. (in Russ.).
  16. Amirov Yu.D., Alferova T.K., Volkov P.N. Tekhnoogichnost konstruktsiy izdeliy [Manufacturability of product designs]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1985. 368 p. (in Russ.).
  17. State Standard 14.205-83. Tekhnologichnost konstruktsii izdeliy. Terminy i opredeleniya [Technological efficiency of products design. Terms and definitions]. 1983. 22 p. (in Russ.).
  18. State Standard 14.201-83. Obespechenie tekhnologichnosti konstruktsii izdeliy. Obshchie trebovaniya [Provision of technological efficiency of products design. General requirements]. 1984. 18 p. (in Russ.).
  19. Korshunov Yu.M. Matematicheskie osnovy kibernetiki [Mathematical foundations of cybernetics]. Moscow, Energoatomizdat Publ., 1987. 496 p. (in Russ.).
  20. Ebeling W. Strukturbildung bei irreversiblen Prozessen. Leipzig, BSB B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, 1976.
  21. Sigorskiy V.P. Matematicheskiy apparat inzhenera [Engineer’s mathematical apparatus]. Kiev, Tekhnika Publ., 1977. 768 p. (in Russ.).
  22. Haken H. Synergetics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1978.
  23. Bazrov, B.M. Kheifets M.L., Popok N.N. Unification of design decisions on the basis of average distribution of probabilities and introduction of isolated areas for elements of products described by structured multiple modules. Nonlinear phenomena in complex systems, 2019, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 221–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/1561-4085-2019-22-3-221-232.
  24. Bazrov B.M. Modulnyy printsip postroeniya stanochnogo oborudovaniya [Module principle of building machinery]. Vestnik mashinostroenia, 2011, no. 11, pp. 51–53 (in Russ.).
  25. Ross D.T., Schoman R.E. Structured analysis for requirements definition. IEEE Transaction on SE, 1997, special edition, no. 1, pp. 6–15.
  26. Koreshkov V.N., Kusakin N.A., Ankuda S.N., Kheifetz I.M. Postroenie determinirovannykh i stokhasticheskikh modeley dlya analiza i upravleniya tekhnologicheskimi protsessami [Construction of deterministic and stochastic models for analysis and control of technological processes]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Physical-technical series, 2015, no. 3, pp. 114–123 (in Russ.).
  27. Vasiliev A.S., Vasin S.A., Dal’sky A.M., Kondakov A.I. Tekhnologicheskie aspekty konversii mashinostroitelnogo proizvodstva [Technological aspects of the conversion of engineering production]. Moscow, Toula, Tulskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2003. 271 p. (in Russ.).
  28. Druzhinin V.V., Kontorov D.S. Problemy sistemologii [Problems of systemology]. Moscow, Sovetskoe radio Publ., 1976. 296 p. (in Russ.).
  29. Balabanov A.N. Tekhnologichnost konstruktsiy detaley mashin [Manufacturability of structures of machine parts]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1987. 336 p. (in Russ.).
  30. Bochkarev P.Yu., Bokova L.G. Otsenka proizvodstvennoy tekhnologichnosti detaley [Assessment of production manufacturability of parts]. Moscow, Lan Publ., 2017. 132 p. (in Russ.).
  31. Bazrov B.M., Troitskiy A.A. Analiz koeffitsientov tekhnologichnosti konstruktivnogo ispolneniya izdeliya [Analysis of the coefficients of manufacturability of the design of the product]. Science intensive technologies in mechanical engineering, 2018, no. 7, pp. 23–26 (in Russ.).