2_2020_sen_9

Title of the article

ASSESSMENT OF ULTIMATE LOAD ON HUMAN FEMUR WITH TELESCOPIC OR ISOELASTIC IMPLANT IN PROXIMAL PART
Authors

BOSIAKOV Sergei M., D. Sc. in Phys. and Math., Dean of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Republic of Belarus, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

NIKOLAITCHIK Mikhail A., Master's Degree Student of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Republic of Belarus, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

MATVEEV Anatoliy L., Ph. D. in Med., Traumatologist-orthopedist of the Department of Traumatology, Novokuybyshevsk Central City Hospital, Novokuybyshevsk, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

MINASOV Timur B., D. Sc. in Med., Head of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
In the section BIOMECHANICS
Year 2020 Issue 2 Pages 83–86
Type of article RAR Index UDK 534/539:[57+61] Index BBK  
Abstract Different intramedullary implants are used to prevent the fractures of the proximal femur due to osteoporosis or tumors. The aim of the study is assessment of the ultimate load on the femur with a telescopic or isoelastic intramedullary
implant attached in its proximal part on the basis of a finite element modeling. The load on the femur corresponds to the action of a human’s own weight. Assessment of the ultimate load is carried out using the damage parameter for finite element, evaluated by the ratio of the main maximum strain and critical deformation for cancellous bone tissue. It has been identified that after using of the telescopic and isoelastic implants, the ultimate load on the femur increases approximately by 48 % and 81 %, respectively, compared with the intact femur. It is indicated that the fracture localization after implant attachment is observed in the area located below the greater trochanter that corresponds to the results of clinical observations.
Keywords

femur, intramedullary implant, telescopic implant, isoelastic implant, ultimate load, finite element modeling
  You can access full text version of the article.
Bibliography
  1. Ossendorf C., Scheyerer M.J., Wanner G.A., Simmen H.P., Werner C.M. Treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years of age — which is ideal modality of primary joint replacement. Patient Safety in Surgery, 2010, vol. 4, pp. 16–27.
  2. Lazarev I.A., Guk Yu.M., Oliynik Yu.V., Skiban M.V. Stress-deformed state of the proximal branch of the cell of fibrous dysplasia under conditions of osteosynthesis by different types of clamps. Trauma, 2015, vol. 16, pp. 49–56.
  3. Bosiakov S., Matveev A., Nikolaitchik M. Assessment of the ultimate load on femur with reinforcing implant in then proximal part. Series of biomechanics, 2018, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 5–10.
  4. Matveev A.L., Nekhozhin A.V. Ustroystvo dlya armirovaniya sheyki bedrennoy kosti i preventivnoy profilaktiki perelomov [Device for strengthening the femoral neck and prevention of fractures]. Patent RF, no. 98901, 2010.
  5. Matveev A.L., Nekhozhin A.V., Minasov T.B., Frolov A.V. Ustroystvo dlya armirovaniya sheyki bedrennoy kosti i preventivnoy profilaktiki perelomov ee pri osteoporoze [Device for strengthening the femoral neck and prevention of its fractures in osteoporosis]. Patent RF, no. 121725, 2012.
  6. Matveev A.L., Nekhozhin A.V., Minasov T.B., Stepanov O.N., Dubrov V.E. Ustroystvo dlya profilakticheskogo armirovaniya i preduprezhdeniya perelomov proksimalnogo otdela bedra [Device for preventive reinforcement and prevention of fractures of the proximal femur]. Patent RF, no. 136703, 2014.
  7. Bosiakov S., Yurkevich K., Silberschmidt V.V., Ershova A. Numerical and analytical model of long tubular bones with anisotropic distribution of elastic properties. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2018, vol. 13, pp. 636–641.
  8. Rho J. An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibial cortical and cancellous bone. Ultrasonics, 1996, vol. 34, pp. 777–783.
  9. Marco M., Giner E., Larrainzar-Garijo R., Caeiro J.R., Miguélez M.H. Modelling of femur fracture using finite element procedures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, vol. 196, pp. 157–167.
  10. Keyak J. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Medical Engineering and Physics, 2001, vol. 23, pp. 165–173.